In the taxi back to our hotel, the driver saw the protest and was making small talks about it. He was initially very cautious in revealing his view of the protest, and Taiwan's relationship with the mainland. But at the end, he was more relax and spoke more. I don't think he consider himself any less Chinese than the mainlanders, and at the same time proud of the civil progress in the Taiwanese society - that protest is allowed and tolerated.
He commented that previously visit by the like of Chen Yun Lin would mean the closure of the meseum. But now they have enough confidence in having controls of the situation that they no longer require the museum be closed to the general public on the day of Chen's visit. The relaxation is a sign of confidence and maturity.
[hide]
His comment sort of answer Kai's comment about power transition. I personally don't think it has much to do with democracy per se. When the general populace is wealthy and prosperous, when they have a collective identity, there can be peaceful power transition.
If you read 孫中山's framework on the development of the Republic of China 建國大綱 (or some name like that, I am not entire sure), it's very clear that Sun advocated first the physical survival of the people, then secure their political rights, then onto other stages. Whenever the US government criticize the mainland China on human rights, the mainland government always point out that they lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, that the first human right is the right to survive. With this framework, Taiwan is at least one stage ahead of the mainland. I don't think the mainland can skip the different stages.
[/hide]